This video speaks for itself and it speaks volumes about the mindset of people who attend and work at UC Berkeley.
The unbridled arrogance of Obamacare architect, Jonathan Gruber, clearly knows no bounds.
If you dare to express concerns about the “Affordable Care Act,” you are nothing more than a small, noisy child in Gruber’s mind. His words indicate a seething contempt for you and your perceived inability to comprehend the nuanced import of the legislation, or to express an intelligent argument against it.
It doesn’t matter what your abilities, education, experience, or background might be. Even “a former senior policy adviser in the White House” can be quickly dismissed as an “adolescent” by this towering intellect, who has been made wealthy by the very tax dollars to which you juveniles so desperately (and ignorantly) cling.
You won’t hear these arguments from the mainstream media, so you should listen to President Obama as he becomes his own best critic on the issue of whether or not he should unilaterally move to grant amnesty for illegal aliens in the U.S.
“I am not a dictator, I’m the President.”
The fundamental article of my political creed is that despotism, or unlimited sovereignty, or absolute power, is the same in a majority of a popular assembly, an aristocratic council, an oligarchical junto, and a single emperor.
- John Adams, Letter to Thomas Jefferson [November 13, 1815]
Beware the greedy hand of government, thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry.
This is absolutely shameful, and it should be criminal. That is, people like Mark Greenburg, HHS Acting Asst. Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families, should be facing prosecution for their actions. Any reasonable person who sees this video should be asking why it takes over four minutes for Mr. Greenburg to plainly state that HHS refuses to check the immigration status of sponsors for the flood of unaccompanied alien children that are crossing our borders right now.
Sen. Coburn’s repeated questions and statements that placing a UAC with an illegal alien sponsor “markedly diminishes” the likelihood that this child will ever be seen by an immigration judge are completely justified. The simple, straightforward fact of the matter – something which Mr. Greenburg skates and dances around for more than four minutes – is that an illegal alien sponsor will not bring a child to an immigration hearing, because doing so would inevitably expose them to a potential deportation hearing themselves.
It is increasingly clear that there is a deliberate, systemic federal policy of ignoring and contravening federal immigration law at every step. So why are there so many people on both sides of the aisle who simply ignore the problem and hope that it will go away?
Freedom of men under government is to have a standing rule to live by, common to every one of that society, and made by legislative power vested in it; a liberty to follow my own will in all things, when the rule prescribes not, and not to be subject to the inconstant, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary will of another man.
– John Locke, The Two Treatises of Civil Government 
Brent Bozell asks a simple, but very pertinent question. That is, “at what point will the news media decide that that the IRS scandal is news?” How much more obvious does it need to get that something is rotten in the state of DC before the media takes part?
Cover up of a cover up is absolutely accurate because the media spent dozens of hours of nightly news covering the Bush TX ANG story. However, they are so thoroughly in the tank for the Obama administration that they can’t even be bothered to cover their own polls when those polls show a strong majority of Americans find fault with the President’s foreign policy.
CNN anchors are now openly and laughingly admitting the media “are the biggest ones promoting (Hillary Clinton’s political) campaign so far.”
It’s time to stick a fork in American “journalism,” it’s done.
Hillary was out stumping for her 2016 Presidential run and burnishing her anti-2nd Amendment cred last night. In a CNN town hall she advocated for reinstating the “assault weapons” ban and attacked firearms owners, arguing that they “terrorize the majority” of Americans.
Asked by an audience member whether an assault weapons ban and magazine capacity limit would affect gun violence in the United States, Clinton answered, “We cannot let a minority of people, and that’s what it is, it is a minority, of people hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.”
In other words, Clinton equated gun owners and gun rights advocates with terrorists. …
But the most galling aspect of Clinton’s response is her flippant dismissal of a substantial section of the population, and her flagrant disregard for Constitutional liberties. According to her, supporting the right to bear arms and protecting that right by being vocal about our liberties is terrorism
Jake Tapper picked up on the same thing in a recent Tweet.
Referring to gun restriction bills not becoming law, @HillaryClinton in town hall refers to minority that "terrorizes" the majority
— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) June 17, 2014
“Nothing is more certain than that a general profligacy and corruption of manners make a people ripe for destruction. A good form of government may hold the rotten materials together for some time, but beyond a certain pitch, even the best constitution will be ineffectual, and slavery must ensue.”
–John Witherspoon, The Dominion of Providence Over the Passions of Men, 1776
Though written constitutions may be violated in moments of passion or delusion, yet they furnish a text to which those who are watchful may again rally and recall the people. They fix, too, for the people the principles of their political creed.
– Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Joseph Priestley 
Seriously people, I am wondering how much worse it has to get before we can plainly state that the Obama administration–with its Keynesian sycophants, heavy-handed regulation, anti-energy, tax-and-spend policies–has completely botched the job?
The U.S. economy may have contracted more than previously thought during the first three months of 2014, private economists said Wednesday based on new health care-sector data from the government.
Some analysts said economic output may have contracted at a 2% pace in the first quarter. That would be its worst performance since the recession. …
J.P. Morgan Chase economist Daniel Silver and Pierpont Securities economist Stephen Stanley both cautioned that it’s not clear exactly how the Commerce Department will adjust GDP to account for the new health-care services data.
But they and other analysts downgraded their estimates for the first quarter based on the new survey, as well as other recently released data. Mr. Silver predicted GDP declined at a 1.6% pace in the first three months of the year. Mr. Stanley predicted contraction at a 2% pace. Macroeconomic Advisers also estimated GDP shrank at a 2% pace.
I submitted a Letter to the Editor at the Casa Grande Dispatch this morning (more of a short op-ed actually). I thought that I would share with with my readers (I know that there are a few of you out there). Lets hope that even a few people will see it and have a better idea who they can vote for (as opposed to just voting against people, like so many do).
Short version for the attention(ally)-impaired is that it is well past time that we return to a constitutionally limited government.
Letter to the Editor: A Constitutionally Limited Government
Government assaults on our country’s founding documents are sadly becoming the norm. Elected officials at all levels now routinely ignore constitutionally prescribed limits on policy and spending, meaning that their legislation and regulations are often based on emotion, special interest pressure, and political expediency.
Since so many elected officials ignore (or are ignorant) of our nation’s founding principles, I have made a point of attending several different meetings in the Casa Grande area where candidates for elected office described their plans and visions for this nation and our state. Thankfully, there are still candidates who support a return to constitutional values and limits on government.
Three of the candidates I met were gubernatorial candidate Christine Jones, CD1 Congressional candidate Adam Kwasman, and State Senatorial candidate Irene Littleton.
Our nation and state are struggling after years of excessive spending, tax increases, and policies that created and then prolonged the economic downturn. So, Christine Jones’ plans to reduce taxes and bring new businesses to Arizona are a breath of fresh air. Lower taxes and business-friendly policies can’t help but kick-start job creation and lift Arizona up to its rightful place as “the brightest star in the Union.”
I grew up in Canada and endured (for most of my life) the waiting lists and high tax rates that characterize socialized medicine. Reports of the Veterans Administration scandal reinforce my concerns over government control of health care. With the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now openly admitting that it is impossible to even track the actual costs of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Adam Kwasman’s proactive plans to put patients in charge of their own care and replace the ACA with market-based solutions like Health Savings Accounts (HSA) and cross state-line insurance shopping are a welcome change.
I work in the energy industry, so was also very pleased to hear both Christine Jones and Mr. Kwasman recognize the importance of developing and maintaining our domestic energy supply. Protecting valuable resources like the Navajo Generating Station and Kayenta Mine will save thousands of jobs and ensure affordable, reliable energy that keeps this state’s (and country’s) economy running.
Lastly, I have lived in Casa Grande for seven years and am involved in community groups like the Casa Grande Chamber of Commerce. In almost every activity, I have seen Irene Littleton’s name or heard stories about her involvement in our community. Few people have spent as much time serving or helping people throughout this region. My wife expends an enormous amount of effort homeschooling our three children, so I was extremely glad to hear Irene boldly state that she will work to remove Common Core requirements from Arizona. (Yes, homeschoolers you are now being impacted by Common Core.)
A return to constitutional limits on government is necessary if we are to ensure prosperity and freedom for this state (and country). Having candidates for elected office who recognize that fact is a step in the right direction.